smart error rma Natural Bridge Station Virginia

Rockbridge Global Village is a local Internet and communications technology provider serving Rockbridge County, Lexington, Buena Vista, Staunton and Waynesboro, Va. RGV is always adding services, updating and offering new technology. As the first Internet provider in Lexington, RGV began offering Internet services to Rockbridge County in 1995. RGV offers Web site hosting and development and provides free hosting services to nonprofit organizations of Rockbridge County. Additional services include DSL and dial-up Internet access, local and long distance telephone services, digital phone service, satellite Internet connections, e-learning and online training courses, home and business network setup and consultation, virus protection and security information and computer repairs, upgrades and troubleshooting.

Address 312 S Main St, Lexington, VA 24450
Phone (540) 463-1952
Website Link

smart error rma Natural Bridge Station, Virginia

After all, if the drive wants to relocate a 'weak sector' as you suggest, it would simply do it. I'm running another round of badblocks testing as we speak, just in case. I don't know exactly what they mean either, someone with more S.M.A.R.T. Badblocks found no errors in 8 passes.

Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Create an account or sign in to comment You need to be a member in order to leave a comment Create BrooklynMatty, Oct 28, 2014 #11 Ericloewe Not-very-passive-but-aggressive Moderator Joined: Feb 15, 2014 Messages: 8,890 Thanks Received: 1,440 Trophy Points: 161 Location: Portugal Your values are a bit higher. This is what can be dangerous.Not all drives have that SMART attribute. sryan2k1 Ars Legatus Legionis et Subscriptor Tribus: Ann Arbor, MI Registered: Nov 28, 2002Posts: 34382 Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 3:42 pm Generally any number of remapped sectors is okay, as

Eric, I have the same issue you had, i am rerunning badblocks again hoping it will go back to a lower value. Sign in to follow this Followers 1 SMART+ Errors? I submitted a case but it has been 3 days with no response. cyberjock said: ↑ Anyway, I wouldn't worry about it.

WD would consider the following to be the definitions: SMART I: Defined by SFF-8035i v1.0 Specification (May 1995). Home Categories FAQ/Guidelines Terms of Service Privacy Policy Powered by Discourse, best viewed with JavaScript enabled Support Downloads Knowledge Base German Spanish Italian French Welcome to the Ars OpenForum. Unfortunately, this being part of a RAID5 array, I would have to shut off the NAS, make a RAW image of the drive using R-Studio or Acronis, and then run diagnostics, Related Resources solved WD 1TB External Hard Drive Light Flashing but Computer not Recognizing After Plugging into Smart TV 1TB WD external hard drive for smart TV movie storage?

Is it possible? Its all working fine now. It's this last value I use. Will i be able to do that? oxter 2011-08-07 14:43:55 UTC #2 You can cancel the RMA, you should be able to replace it latter on, if you determent that the

I'd try to RMA such a drive if it were under warranty, otherwise I'd take it out of service. You can do it within windows explorer. It was also showing a Current Pending Sector count of 4. I'd consider replacing the disk even if it passed the tests - the non-zero current pending sector count, plus the non-zero multi-zone error rate suggest there may be a problem developing.

Read the FreeNAS manual. You have to look at the RAW VALUE instead! Thanks. On a WD of mine it start at 0 and the threshold is 51.

I mean, why not check and see how they're doing? Again, my concern was that HD Tune software showed warnings as below(it corresponds to first screenshot): hard-drive smart share|improve this question edited Apr 29 at 8:19 fixer1234 11.2k122949 asked Sep 19 If you have current pending sectors it means you have so many your drive can't transparently recover from them. As my problem has changed from SMART error to something else.

Has this count also gone back to 0? SMART was originally developed and defined by the SFF committee in the mid 90s. Devin Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius Tribus: Student of Glosophopaphrology Registered: Sep 9, 2001Posts: 8100 Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:20 am Eh, what? If this value is increasing then you should put that drive on deathwatch and be prepared to replace it.

If it was under 100 I'd keep an eye on it, if it was over that I'd look to replace it. Thanks again appreciate your advice. Here's what I see: Raw Read Error Rate 52 Spin Up Time 8000 Start Stop Count 104 Reallocated Sector Count 2 Seek Error Rate 195 Power On Hours 18593 Spin Retry I've seen drives with a varying number of remapped sectors from the factory, but they all stayed at that number, as soon as they started climbing the drive was within a

On a WD of mine it start at 0 and the threshold is 51. Anyway, won't hurt asking WD directly. Does a natural 20 on an animal handling check do anything special? 2N2222 experiment is indicating incorrect gains Better translation for "Roadblock" on projects language How do you get a friend's Hardware recommendations • RAID5/RAIDZ1 is dead Read my guide!

This can be either weak electric charge with insufficient ECC correction ability -OR- it can be physical damage. It is a WD 3TB Red Drive btw. In my experience once a drive starts packing on the reallocated sectors, it will never get better. It's a bit more complicated than that.

The actual normalized value depends per drive. Reallocated sector value is 100 for one, 200 for the other, each matching their "worst" value (different manufacturers seem to have different values from what I read). I'd recommend you stress that drive as much as you can. SMART had several evolutions that are sometimes referred to as SMART I, II and III.

So, i went through the WD FAQ and downloaded Windows Data Lifeguard Diagnostics and tested my WD Quck Test :: Failed with error code 07 (which means drive is damaged and All Rights Reserved. attributes and the typical meaning of their raw values. Sign In Sign In Remember me Not recommended on shared computers Sign in anonymously Sign In Forgot your password?

I'd recommend you stress that drive as much as you can. error, please contact the system or BIOS manufacturer for an updated BIOS revision. It answers common questions newbies to FreeNAS have. The latter went back to 0 after a few rounds of badblocks, the former stayed at 2.

absrapNov 30, 2013, 6:39 AM absrap said: lonewolf7 said: No question about it. Good luck. But I'd definitely be sure to setup a good SMART schedule as well as a good scrub schedule just as a precaution. It is, after all, a 'defect', and you should be able to get the disk repaired or get a new one.

wonko View Public Profile Find More Posts by wonko 9th Jan 2013, 17:55 #9 divuk83 Hitman Joined: Mar 2006 Location: York Posts: 978 Quote: Originally Posted by bremen1874 Multi WDC Support Downloads Knowledge Base Product Registration Warranty Services Contact Ask a Question Contact Support Feedback Other Sites Online Learning Center CONNECT WD Blog © 2016 Western Digital Technologies, Inc. bremen1874 View Public Profile Find More Posts by bremen1874 9th Jan 2013, 10:42 #8 wonko Wise Guy Joined: Jul 2008 Location: Outside the asylum Posts: 1,267 +1. Can somebody help to interpret the state of those 2 hard drives and tell me if a) I am close to failure b) I can now claim for RAM with this

RMA the drive? Quote: Raw Read Error Rate 0 Spin Up Time 6566 Start Stop Count 36 Reallocated Sector Count 0 Seek Error Rate 0 Power On Hours 18905 Spin Retry Count 0 Calibration